search

'No Anarchy': SC Says Sabarimala, Other Religious Institutions Must Follow Norms

deltin55 1970-1-1 05:00:00 views 100

Summary of this article




  • The court said there cannot be anarchy in religious institutions and emphasised the need for clear norms and regulation.
  • The bench noted that management rights must align with constitutional principles and cannot permit discrimination.






The Supreme Court on Tuesday underscored that the right to manage a religious institution must be exercised within a structured framework, stressing that there cannot be anarchy and that clear modalities and norms are essential for its functioning.




The remark came from a nine-judge Constitution bench during hearings on petitions concerning discrimination against women at religious sites, including the Sabarimala Temple in Kerala, as well as the scope of religious freedom across faiths.






The bench comprised Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices B V Nagarathna, M M Sundresh, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, Augustine George Masih, Prasanna B Varale, R Mahadevan, and Joymalya Bagchi.



Advocate Nizam Pasha, appearing for Peerzada Syed Altamash Nizami, a direct ancestral descendant in the Chisti Nizami lineage associated with the dargah of Hazrat Khwaja Nizamuddin Aulia, submitted that a dargah is a burial site of a saint.



"Within Islam, there are differing views regarding the status of saints after death, but in the Sufi system of belief, there is deep reverence attached to the place where a saint is interred.



[url=]Related Content[/url]


SC Stresses Limits of Judicial Review in Religious Practices: Sabarimala Case



Supreme Court Refers Teesta Setalvad’s Passport Plea to Three-Judge Bench



Can The Court Label A Practice As 'Superstitious'? Supreme Court Questions Centre’s Stand



'Courts Interfere When Social Evils Are Branded As Religious Practice': SC Begins Sabarimala Hearing





[url=]Related Content[/url]

SC Stresses Limits of Judicial Review in Religious Practices: Sabarimala Case

Supreme Court Refers Teesta Setalvad’s Passport Plea to Three-Judge Bench

Can The Court Label A Practice As 'Superstitious'? Supreme Court Questions Centre’s Stand

'Courts Interfere When Social Evils Are Branded As Religious Practice': SC Begins Sabarimala Hearing
like (0)
deltin55administrator

Post a reply

loginto write comments
deltin55

He hasn't introduced himself yet.

410K

Threads

12

Posts

1410K

Credits

administrator

Credits
144952