GSTAT Success Hinges on Prepared Cases, Clear Strategy: Experts
Seven years after the rollout of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), tax experts and members of the newly operational Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) have stressed that success before the tribunal will depend on meticulous preparation, strong factual presentation and sound litigation strategy.Speaking at a national conference on operationalising GSTAT organised by the PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PHDCCI), GSTAT President Justice (Retd.) Sanjaya Kumar Misra said the tribunal's effectiveness would be measured by its ability to deliver timely and substantive justice while providing legal certainty to taxpayers.
"The success of GSTAT lies in delivering timely, effective and substantive justice," Justice Misra said.
He urged tax practitioners to maintain complete command over facts and approach litigation with professionalism and diligence. According to PHDCCI, Justice Misra also underlined the tribunal's guiding principle of "Appellate Devo Bhava", assuring appellants of fair and unbiased hearings.
He said minor procedural lapses would not prevent adjudication on the merits if essential documents were available, reflecting the tribunal's focus on substantive justice rather than technicalities.
Justice Misra further said a committee has been constituted to examine stakeholder representations and recommend improvements to the GSTAT portal, including greater automation.
Highlighting the scale of the task before the tribunal, CA Ashok Batra, Chair of PHDCCI's Indirect Tax Committee, said GSTAT is expected to serve as a cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism for taxpayers.
Despite delays in its establishment, the tribunal has already witnessed significant activity, with more than 8,000 registrations and around 11,400 appeals filed on the GSTAT portal, he said.
Given the volume of pending matters, disposal of cases could take time during the initial phase of operations, Batra added.
Judicial Member Mayank Jain said litigants approaching the tribunal with truthful facts, full disclosure and procedural discipline would receive a fair hearing. He also indicated that orders would be drafted in simple and accessible language to improve taxpayer understanding.
Technical Member Rajeev Kapoor emphasised the importance of concise and legally sustainable grounds of appeal. He said well-prepared reconciliation statements and succinct case synopses could significantly assist the Bench, particularly in complex disputes involving extensive facts.
Judicial Member Pramod Kumar Rai advised the appellants to focus on clear statements of fact and robust grounds of appeal. Arguments should primarily be advanced on merits, while limitations and legal grounds should be relied upon where appropriate, he said.
According to PHDCCI, participants across the conference agreed that the new appellate framework presents a significant shift in GST litigation. They observed that successful outcomes before GSTAT would depend on a combination of procedural clarity, preparedness, effective communication and strategic case management.
The conference concluded with a call for meaningful dispute resolution and greater finality in GST-related litigation, reflecting a broader push towards a taxpayer-friendly appellate system.
Pages:
[1]